Geez... did you hear? The Jacksons are going on tour next year. Seriously?? Why?! Who is the audience for this tour? I mean, I get why they need the money but, damn, Tito is going to be 55 next year! No, really. Jackie will be closer to 60 than 50... hell, Michael will be 50! Again, who wants to see this!?! The last hit they had as The Jacksons, "Shake Your Body (Down To The Ground)" came out 30 years ago.

This is just wrong. It's not like The Temptations or O'Jays going on tour... they were grown ass men during the height of their careers so their songs hold up now. The Jacksons songs will just sound silly... or creepy. Why don't performers know when it's time to hang 'em up? This is somewhere between Ernie Isley still rocking the vest with no shirt underneath [dude, that look is over for you] and Garry Shider from Parliament still wearing the diaper [okay, nothing is as nasty as that!].

I did find the press coverage interesting. Depending on where you live this is either noteworthy or an excuse to diss the Jackson family. I'm not trying to make it personal, I just can't figure out who the demographic is for this joint. The picture I have in my head isn't pretty though, on or off the stage.

Thirty years ago this would have been a big deal for all the right reasons, now I just want to tell them, "Stop! The [shame] you save may be your own."


I've been thinking a lot lately about the state of hip-hop culture. I guess a natural outgrowth of hip-hop as a cultural phenomenon is other groups taking and molding the culture to fit their own views and needs. I came face-to-face with this notion the other day while doing random web surfing... y'know how you start looking for one thing and forty minutes later end up on a site so far removed from the original search you forget what you were looking for... no?... just me? Anyway, I came across a site that covers indie rock and hip-hop music. The first thing that caught my eye was in a story about the new Wu-Tang album and to make a long story short, the dude writing the story made a crack, "that should be good news to you Wu-Tang fans... both of you" or words to that effect. The story was written by a White guy. My first thought was, Word!?! Does he really think he has a handle on the following of the Wu? Well, that wasn't my first thought but it was my first thought without profanity.

After reading that story I decided to delve further into this site whereupon I find a review of Common's latest joint, "Finding Forever". They basically hated it. Really?... I thought it was one of the best albums of '07. Common is one of the few emcees still making real hip-hop music and Barney from the 'burbs thinks it's wack. I read on and catch a few other reviews and basically what I discover is my opinion is almost always different from their reviewer [they have several]. That took me down a road of, should you review stuff that's not intended for you in the first place? How can you expect to "get" something that is from a place you've never been? How much of a role does context play when evaluating art? I mean, should I get the latest White Stripes album and complain that it's too noisy and the lyrics aren't relevant? I actually like some of their stuff but they are not talking to me... or making music with me in mind... would I be the best person to judge the merits of their albums? Probably not.

The funny thing about the reviews is how well written and constructed they were... these guys had clearly done their homework. For each artist they were citing cuts from previous albums and making references to hometowns and producers and all of the things you could learn from buying a few cds and hitting google... it's like they were trying to substitute literary writing for actual experience in the culture to prove their qualifications... to let us know they were down. Uhh... no. Being able to turn a phrase and quote lyrics from a body of work doesn't tell me you understand the essence of the message.

So I'm heated about the fact that these dudes are getting shine [none here, they will remain nameless] and are putting out ill-informed reviews... then it hit me... their reviews weren't written for me. It had not occurred to me that other groups consider hip-hop music something they can own too. So now I'm wrestling with the idea that we can't just wrap our arms around hip-hop music and claim sole ownership. Even though we still produce the overwhelming majority of this music, we are not the only consumers - some might argue we aren't even the largest consumer group any more. I guess that means other groups have the right to call it as they see it. Even if they are wrong. This must be the way cats at Timberland and Moet felt when their products were co-opted, something like, "I'll take your money but, what are you doing to my product?!" Once it's in the public domain, you can't really control what folks do with your creation.

I used to let out a cynical chuckle anytime I encountered a mainstream music critic writing about hip-hop music because I felt he or she couldn't possibly be qualified to write the review. Of course, until now I assumed they were talking to me. I'm now wrapping my head around the idea that they don't need me to have their conversation on the music. So if Mitchell wants to tell Ward what to think of the latest Talib Kweli album there isn't anything I can do about it. They reserve the right to express what it means to them even if that has nothing to do with what the album means to Talib or me or you. Damn. I think I'm going to review some White Stripes... that'll show 'em.


Jill Scott has been here before. Her soul comes from another place, another time. In an industry that celebrates style over substance, Jill brings both... like they used to. She makes music from her soul that touches your soul. But, Jill isn't just on some sentimental journey, she can make your head bob ['cause your neck knows]. On "Epiphany" she drops a slow flow that opens your eyes to her emcee skills. But, as with most of her songs, you have to listen... the track details an encounter with a lover that takes it to another level physically but... at the last minute... she let's you know it's not enough. Of course, "Crown Royal" is a different story. On a note-for-note basis, this could be the sexist song ever recorded. The joint is only 1:49, but she packs in about 10 minutes of sexy.

Ms. Scott gives us the whole range of emotion. On "The Real Thing" she is that strong sistah, the backbone who tells a brotha "when you're lost and you need some focus come see me..." - she's got you. Jill flashes her tough skin on "Hate On Me" when she tells the haters "in reality, I'm going to be who I be" since she realizes they can't be satisfied. Crazy, sick line, "if I gave you diamonds out of my own womb, would you feel the love in that or ask why not the moon?" Say Word. But Jill also gives us the raw, the vulnerable... on "Insomnia" she let's us know that a dude who doesn't deserve her devotion has her open... doing things she never thought she would... spying, throwin' bricks, etc. You can feel her shame when she says, "after being chased, I have been dismissed... you have managed to turn me from a woman of substance to this." Despite some tough times Jill let's you know she doesn't want your pity "'cause [she's] going through a couple things..." in "Wanna Be Loved"... she is basically saying, like everyone else, she just wants to find that one cat to vibe with.

For me this album represents a return to form, not for Jill but for her team. I liked her last joint, "Beautifully Human: Words & Sounds, Vol. 2 but it seemed like the production was a few steps behind. Jill still gave us gems like "I'm Not Afraid", "The Fact Is [I Need You]", "Spring Summer Feeling" and "Not Like Crazy" but many of the beats on the album just felt like leftovers. Again, I dug it but it didn't hit as hard. On Vol. 3 everybody is playing their position... the joints feel good... like music is supposed to feel.

She has inadvertently answered the question in her first album title, "Who Is Jill Scott?"... she is most definitely "The Real Thing"... go get it.

11/07/2007

Playlist



  • Ludacris ft Rick Ross & Bun B - Down In the Dirty

  • Fergie - Clumsy

  • Sneaker Pimps - 6 Underground

  • Lupe Fiasco - Superstar

  • Caron Wheeler - Blue [Is The Color of Pain]

  • Chrisette Michelle - Is This The Way Love Feels

  • Daddy Yankee - Plane To P.R.

  • White Stripes - Icky Thump

  • Soulive - Arruga [Remix]

  • Max Bill - Goochi

  • Aretha Franklin - Never Loved A Man [The Way That I Love You]

  • Mobb Deep - The Learning [Burn]

  • DJ Cam - Comewithastring

  • As One - Shed Dem

  • 4th Floor - A Night In New York

  • Yummy - Come Get It

  • Goapele - First Love

  • The Brand New Heavies - Love Is

  • People Under The Stairs - Schooled In The Trade

  • Lina - My Fix